Part I
Question 1
Denoting
Question 2
Assertion I is correct and Assertion II is correct.
Question 3
We need to find
In the modified plan,
: Reject after first sample ( defective in first ) : Reject after second sample ( defective total in , but in first ) : Continue to third sample ( defective total in first )
Let
Calculating
Calculating
This occurs when
For
Therefore:
Calculating
Calculating expected value
Question 4
Given:
For a Poisson distribution:
Calculating control limits
Defining false alarm condition
Since
Calculating probability using normal approximation
For large
Therefore:
Question 5
Given:
- Original process:
, LCL = - Improved process:
- Measurements taken every
hours
Finding probability of detection per measurement
Under the improved process,
Model as geometric distribution
The number of measurements until first detection follows a geometric distribution with parameter
Expected number of trials until first success:
Converting to hours
Since measurements are taken every
Question 6
Moving average control chart with last
Calculating mean of moving average
Calculating variance of moving average
Since wafers are independent over time:
Therefore:
Calculating Upper Control Limit
Part II
Question 7
Given
Question 8
By the sampling distributions, for the first specification:
By the central limit theorem, for the second specification, we want:
Question 9
We can see from the calculation that the higher the
Part III
Question 10
The standard error measures the accuracy of the estimate, which is better for larger n, for fixed levels of time.
Question 11
The outer dotted lines in the graph represent the
Question 12
This is a classic case for the use of bayes’ rule. We know
That means:
We want to know
Question 13
According to the central limit theorem:
Part III
Question 14
The width of a confidence interval for the difference between two means depends on:
Where
Effect of removing outliers:
-
Sample size effect:
decreases from to- This tends to increase the standard error slightly
- Effect:
increases marginally
-
Outlier removal effect: Removing extreme values (times
min)- Substantially reduces sample variability
- Pooled standard deviation
decreases significantly - Effect: Much smaller
Dominant effect:
The reduction in
Conclusion:
Since removing outliers dramatically reduces variability while the sample size reduction is minimal (
Therefore the new confidence interval will be narrower.
Question 15
Assertion I: correct.
Assertion II: incorrect – we can see the difference in the two averages, but not the levels.
Question 16
The boxplots show the errors, meaning
Question 17
Given data:
For each measure, we test whether the mean error differs significantly from zero.
(no systematic error) (systematic error exists)- Critical region:
, where
Femoral flexion:
Since
Axial rotation:
Since
Tibia slope:
Since
Therefore:
A significant difference for femoral flexion angle and for tibia slope, but not for femoral axial rotation.
Question 18
The data come from the same
An appropriate statistical test is a two-sided paired t-test, and we know the observed average difference will be
Question 19
We have two groups (RAN and CAN) and want to compare the proportions of patients with different comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, neither). This creates a contingency table:
Diabetes | Hypertension | Neither | |
---|---|---|---|
RAN group | ? | ? | ? |
CAN group | ? | ? | ? |
We want to test whether group membership (RAN vs CAN) is independent of comorbidity status. This is a test of association between two categorical variables.
The appropriate test is a chi-squared test for association, which tests:
: Group membership and comorbidity are independent : Group membership and comorbidity are associated
Question 20
From the power curve graph with Error Std Dev
Assertion I:
The probability of getting a
Since the true difference in means is
Assertion I is incorrect.
Assertion II Analysis:
Power depends on the effect size, which is the standardized difference:
Original:
New scenario:
Since both effect sizes are identical (
Assertion II is correct.